$140-$380/hr cath lab and structural heart work, on your schedule
Review AI-drafted angiographic reads, PCI plans, and structural-heart recommendations the way you'd check a case before wheeling in: flag the unneeded stent, defend the negative FFR. Remote, paid per task.
Trusted by top research companies
Hi, we're Zac and Jack, the founders of Terac. We want to talk to you directly, because you are the most important part of what we're building.
Terac is a community of experts. People who have spent years getting good at something specific and hard. The world is about to need more of you, not less. As AI takes on more of the world's work, the bottleneck shifts to the people who actually know what they're talking about.
Expert labor is the rarest resource in the world right now, and it is shockingly hard to find. The companies that need an interventionalist flagging an FFR-negative lesion the model wanted to stent spend weeks chasing people, paying placement fees, and settling for whoever is available. Meanwhile thousands of qualified people are sitting with knowledge that no one ever asks for.
That gap is what we're here to close. Every project that lands on Terac is routed to the people who actually know the answer, on their schedule, paid fairly, and only when the work is verified. No middleman taking a cut of your time. No vague gigs. No chasing checks.
We care about every single person in this community. If you join Terac, you're not a row in a database to us. We read the feedback. We answer the emails. We will fight for you when a customer is being unreasonable, and we will be honest with you when something on our side is broken. The quality of this panel is our entire company, and we owe you a serious bar.
If you've made it this far, here is what we're asking: claim your profile. Put your expertise on the record. Let the world's most ambitious teams come find you for the work only you can do.
Interventional Cardiology questions
Still curious? Write to us at support@terac.com.
Operators reason in flow and procedural feasibility, not just stenosis. You know when a negative FFR defers a tight-looking lesion, when calcification demands atherectomy first, and when a case belongs to the heart team. That cath-lab judgment is the gap these projects pay you to close.
We ask for board certification in interventional cardiology and an active or recent US license. Active or recent operator experience with PCI, FFR/iFR, or structural heart is required for most projects. We verify credentials at onboarding via Government ID and professional attestations.
Neither. You evaluate AI outputs and training data, with no patient relationship, no procedures, and no liability. You apply your expertise to judge whether the model's revascularization and structural reasoning is safe, the way you'd review a case before the lab.
AI angiographic reads, PCI and revascularization plans, FFR/iFR and intravascular imaging interpretations, structural-heart recommendations, and periprocedural antithrombotic plans. You flag flawed logic, defend appropriate-use and physiologic thresholds, and write adversarial cases.
It is a core focus. Models over-trust percent stenosis and ignore physiology, so they recommend stenting flow-insignificant lesions. You mark exactly those cases, where FFR, iFR, or IVUS overrides the eyeball estimate, so the model learns to act on flow and not just the picture.
Why your expertise matters
Today's interventional AI reads percent stenosis but not flow, recommends stenting lesions a negative FFR says to defer, and misses when staged complete revascularization beats culprit-only. Catching that takes an operator, not a label set. Your corrections teach these tools to act on physiology, not the picture.
How pay works
Interventional cardiologists earn $140 to $380 an hour, the top medical band here. Straightforward angiographic review sits lower; bifurcation, CTO, FFR-guided, and structural cases reach the ceiling. Remote and asynchronous, a few hours a week. Paid hourly for review, with bonuses on adversarial cases.
What the work looks like
A sample of the cath lab and structural heart work you would pick up. Every project is scoped, remote, and paid on verified completion.
- Flag an AI read that recommended stenting a 60% lesion with a negative FFR, and explain why deferral is correct.
- Grade two PCI plans and catch the one that chose culprit-only where staged complete revascularization was indicated.
- Audit a structural-heart recommendation that pushed a TAVR candidate to surgery without heart-team input.
- Rank lesion-complexity assessments and flag the one ignoring heavy calcification that needs atherectomy first.
- Write a case where IVUS shows a hazy lesion is actually a dissection, testing whether the model over-reads stenosis.
- Critique a periprocedural plan with an antiplatelet regimen unsafe for the patient's bleeding risk.
Specialties we match
Interventional Cardiology projects span a wide range of focus areas. Tell us where you go deep and we route the work that fits.
- Coronary angiography interpretation
- PCI strategy and stent selection
- FFR and iFR physiologic assessment
- Lesion complexity grading (bifurcation, CTO, calcific)
- Structural heart evaluation (TAVR, mitral, LAA)
- Appropriate-use criteria application
- Intravascular imaging (IVUS, OCT) interpretation
- Complete versus culprit-only revascularization decisions
- Periprocedural antithrombotic management
- Access-site and complication management
- Heart-team and surgical-referral judgment
- Hemodynamic interpretation in the cath lab
