FP&A Assessment:Operating Model Review
Eight findings, each confirmed by two blind peer reviews, on a finished seven-year three-statement model. Everything a script can detect is published in advance and scores nothing.
Three ways in
A place on a board is earned per finding rather than per attempt, because most findings do not clear the checks and volume is not the thing being measured.
- 01
Sit the assessment
Read the brief, work through the material, and hand back what you found. Up to 8 findings, dropped by submission order past the cap, so submit the ones you would defend rather than the ones you hope for.
Start the exam - 02
Check other people's findings
Two people rule on every finding, and the queue only moves if the people in it do the checking. You see the finding with the author removed from the record before it reaches you, and answer one question: does this actually happen.
Open the queue - 03
Propose material
An assessment needs two things: a real artefact, and an honest list of the problems its authors already know about. If you have both, we want it. The hard part of building these is finding work that is genuinely worth examining.
Join the community
